4.7 Article

Stroke promotes the development of brain atrophy and delayed cell death in hypertensive rats

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75450-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health (NIH) [R01 NS104573, R21-NS088016]
  2. Veterans Affairs (VA) Merit Review [BX000891, R01 NS083559]
  3. VA Merit Review [BX000347]
  4. VA Senior Research Career Scientist Award [IK BX004471]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a major source of disability, affecting up to two thirds of stroke survivors with no available therapeutic options. The condition remains understudied in preclinical models due to its delayed presentation. Although hypertension is a leading risk factor for dementia, how ischemic stroke contributes to this neurodegenerative condition is unknown. In this study, we used a model of hypertension to study the development of PSCI and its mechanisms. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were compared to normotensive rats and were subjected to 1-h middle cerebral artery occlusion or sham surgery. Novel object recognition, passive avoidance test and Morris water maze were used to assess cognition. In addition, brain magnetic resonance images were obtained 12-weeks post-stroke and tissue was collected for immunohistochemistry and protein quantification. Stroked animals developed impairment in long-term memory at 4-weeks post-stroke despite recovery from motor deficits, with hypertensive animals showing some symptoms of anhedonia. Stroked SHRs displayed grey matter atrophy and had a two-fold increase in apoptosis in the ischemic borderzone and increased markers of inflammatory cell death and DNA damage at 12 weeks post-stroke. This indicates that preexisting hypertension exacerbates the development of secondary neurodegeneration after stroke beyond its acute effects on neurovascular injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available