4.7 Article

Method for the Development of WISH, a Globally Applicable Index for Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13010093

Keywords

diet quality; sustainable diet; index; food system

Funding

  1. CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH)
  2. CGIAR Trust Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The WISH index was developed to evaluate diets for both healthiness and sustainability. The scoring system, based on EAT-Lancet recommendations, can differentiate between the healthiness and environmental impact of a specific diet, as shown in a study on Vietnamese diets.
Promoting both a healthy diet and at the same time considering the environmental sustainability aspects of production and consumption of the diet are urgent global issues. We developed the WISH (World Index for Sustainability and Health) to evaluate diets for healthiness and sustainability. The WISH seeks to measure two complex multidimensional concepts, diet quality and environmental sustainability, in one scoring system. The WISH is based on the EAT-Lancet recommendations for a healthy and sustainable diet in the general population with global applicability across multiple settings. Thirteen food groups are scored between 0 and 10, based on their association with disease and impact on environmental indicators. The scoring system was applied using a dataset of duplicate 24 h dietary recalls from 396 urban Vietnamese men and women. Out of a maximum score of 130, the mean total WISH score was 46 (SD 11), and scores for the healthy and high-environmental impact sub-scores were mean 25 (11) (out of 100) and mean 26 (8) (out of 70) respectively. A higher score was observed for the less-healthy (mean 20 (2) out of 30) sub-score. Our initial analysis shows that the WISH is able to differentiate between the healthiness and the environmental sustainability of a Vietnamese diet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available