4.6 Review

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation: From Concept to Application

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE BULLETIN
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 853-862

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12264-020-00619-y

Keywords

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation; Concept; Application; Development

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1705800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81803872, 81674072]
  3. Joint Sino-German Research Project [GZ1236]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Public Welfare Research Institutes [ZZ201813006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The connection between the ear and the rest of the body has been explored for a long time, leading to the development of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) which aims to treat diseases non-invasively. TaVNS has been extensively researched and applied as an alternative to drug treatment for various diseases.
Whether in the West or the East, the connection between the ear and the rest of the body has been explored for a long time. Especially in the past century or more, the relevant theoretical and applied research on the ear has greatly promoted the development of ear therapy, and finally the concept of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been proposed. The purpose of taVNS is to treat a disease non-invasively by applying electrical current to the cutaneous receptive field formed by the auricular branch of the vagus nerve in the outer ear. In the past two decades, taVNS has been a topic of basic, clinical, and transformation research. It has been applied as an alternative to drug treatment for a variety of diseases. Based on the rapid understanding of the application of taVNS to human health and disease, some limitations in the development of this field have also been gradually exposed. Here, we comprehensively review the origin and research status of the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available