4.8 Article

Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages 1074-1084

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-020-00952-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ClimateWorks Foundation
  2. Pardee Center for International Futures
  3. University of Denver
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [821471, 642147]
  5. Natural Environment Research Council (UK-SCAPE programme) [601 NE/R016429/1]
  6. European Commission (RI Action) [821010]
  7. Academy of Finland [329223, 330915]
  8. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan [JPMEERF20202002]
  9. JSPS KAKENHI [19K24387]
  10. Sumitomo Foundation
  11. Met Office (Climate Resilience Strategic Priority Fund) [DN420214 -CR19-3]
  12. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K24387] Funding Source: KAKEN
  13. Academy of Finland (AKA) [329223, 330915, 330915, 329223] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The SSP-RCP scenario framework has been an important component of physical, social and integrated climate change research for the past decade. This Perspective reviews the successes of the framework and the challenges it faces, and provides suggestions for improvement moving forward. Long-term global scenarios have underpinned research and assessment of global environmental change for four decades. Over the past ten years, the climate change research community has developed a scenario framework combining alternative futures of climate and society to facilitate integrated research and consistent assessment to inform policy. Here we assess how well this framework is working and what challenges it faces. We synthesize insights from scenario-based literature, community discussions and recent experience in assessments, concluding that the framework has been widely adopted across research communities and is largely meeting immediate needs. However, some mixed successes and a changing policy and research landscape present key challenges, and we recommend several new directions for the development and use of this framework.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available