4.6 Article

Formaldehyde Emissions from Wooden Toys: Comparison of Different Measurement Methods and Assessment of Exposure

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14020262

Keywords

formaldehyde; wooden toys; emission test chamber; flask method; EN 717-3; microchamber

Funding

  1. BfR [1329-559, 1322-631]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study highlighted the need for a reliable and convenient method for monitoring formaldehyde release from toys, as current methods are not ideal. Researchers tested the feasibility of using miniaturised emission test chambers and found that they showed better consistency in results compared to standard methods.
Formaldehyde is considered as carcinogenic and is emitted from particleboards and plywood used in toy manufacturing. Currently, the flask method is frequently used in Europe for market surveillance purposes to assess formaldehyde release from toys, but its concordance to levels measured in emission test chambers is poor. Surveillance laboratories are unable to afford laborious and expensive emission chamber testing to comply with a new amendment of the European Toy Directive; they need an alternative method that can provide reliable results. Therefore, the application of miniaturised emission test chambers was tested. Comparisons between a 1 m(3) emission test chamber and 44 mL microchambers with two particleboards over 28 days and between a 24 L desiccator chamber and the microchambers with three puzzle samples over 10 days resulted in a correlation coefficient r(2) of 0.834 for formaldehyde at steady state. The correlation between the results obtained in microchambers vs. flask showed a high variability over 10 samples (r(2): 0.145), thereby demonstrating the error-proneness of the flask method in comparison to methods carried out under ambient parameters. An exposure assessment was also performed for three toy puzzles: indoor formaldehyde concentrations caused by puzzles were not negligible (up to 8 mu g/m(3)), especially when more conservative exposure scenarios were considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available