4.6 Article

Impact of Layer Thickness and Storage Time on the Properties of 3D-Printed Dental Dies

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14030509

Keywords

dentistry; 3D-printing; printed dies; dimensional stability; surface roughness; stereolithography

Funding

  1. Department of Prosthodontics and Digital Technology at the School of Dental Medicine of Stony Brook University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that changing the layer thickness in 3D printing does not affect repeatability or surface roughness, but it does impact the dimensional stability of the dies.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of printing layer thickness on the repeatability and surface roughness of 3D-printed dies and detect the effect of layer thickness and storage time on the dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies. One stereolithography (STL) file of an upper molar prepared for a full ceramic crown was used to print three groups of dies: 25 mu m, 50 mu m, and 100 mu m. Repeatability was evaluated by linear and area measurements with a digital caliper and a digital metrology microscope. Dimensional stability was analyzed at 3 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year of storage time. Surface roughness parameters were measured with a 3D confocal laser scanning microscope. Statistics were completed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc tests, p < 0.05. Printing time decreased as layer thickness increased. All groups showed high repeatability and comparable surface roughness while showing differences in their linear dimensions and surface areas. At the 3 week storage interval, dimensional changes were observed in all groups. Within this experimental study's constraints, it can be concluded that changing the 3D-printing layer thickness does not affect the repeatability or the surface roughness of the product; meanwhile, changes to the layer thickness and storage time influence the dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available