4.6 Article

Removal of Siloxanes from Model Biogas by Means of Deep Eutectic Solvents in Absorption Process

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14020241

Keywords

absorption; biogas; deep eutectic solvents; siloxanes

Funding

  1. [DEC-34/2020/IDUB/I.3.3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study screened 20 deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and 6 conventional solvents, and found that TPABr:TEG (1:3) is a highly effective absorption solvent for removing siloxanes from model biogas, with the main driving force being the formation of hydrogen bonds between DES and siloxanes.
The paper presents the screening of 20 deep eutectic solvents (DESs) composed of tetrapropylammonium bromide (TPABr) and glycols in various molar ratios, and 6 conventional solvents as absorbents for removal of siloxanes from model biogas stream. The screening was achieved using the conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) based on the comparison of siloxane solubility in DESs. For the DES which was characterized by the highest solubility of siloxanes, studies of physicochemical properties, i.e., viscosity, density, and melting point, were performed. DES composed of tetrapropylammonium bromide (TPABr) and tetraethylene glycol (TEG) in a 1:3 molar ratio was used as an absorbent in experimental studies in which several parameters were optimized, i.e., the temperature, absorbent volume, and model biogas flow rate. The mechanism of siloxanes removal was evaluated by means of an experimental FT-IR analysis as well as by theoretical studies based on sigma-profile and sigma-potential. On the basis of the obtained results, it can be concluded that TPABr:TEG (1:3) is a very effective absorption solvent for the removal of siloxanes from model biogas, and the main driving force of the absorption process is the formation of the hydrogen bonds between DES and siloxanes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available