Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 325-334Publisher
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00651-x
Keywords
Anaesthesia; Cattle; Dead space; Pulmonary monitoring; Volumetric capnography
Categories
Funding
- Murdoch University, Western Australia
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found a linear relationship between electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and global tidal volume (VT), which remains stable under different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This discovery may have potential applications for monitoring and assessment in vivo.
Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is used in lung physiology monitoring. There is evidence that EIT is linearly associated with global tidal volume (VT) in clinically healthy patients where no positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is applied. This linearity has not been challenged by altering lung conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of PEEP on VT estimation, using EIT technology and spirometry, and observe the stability of the relationship under changing lung conditions. Twelve male castrated cattle (Steer), mean age 7.8 months (SD +/- 1.7) were premedicated with xylazine followed by anaesthesia induction with ketamine and maintenance with halothane in oxygen via an endotracheal tube. An EIT belt was applied around the thorax at the level of the fifth intercostal space. Volume controlled ventilation was used. PEEP was increased in a stepwise manner from 0 to 5, 10 and 15 cmH(2)O. At each PEEP, the VT was increased stepwise from 5 to 10 and 15 mL kg(-1). After a minute of stabilisation, total impedance change (VTEIT), using EIT and VT measured by a spirometer connected to a flow-partitioning device (VTSpiro) was recorded for the following minute before changing ventilator settings. Data was analysed using linear regression and multi variable analysis. There was a linear relationship between VTEIT and VTSpiro at all levels of PEEP with an R-2 of 0.71, 0.68, 0.63 and 0.63 at 0, 5, 10 and 15 cmH(2)O, respectively. The variance in VTEIT was best described by peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and PEEP (adjusted R-2 0.82) while variance in VTSpiro was best described by PIP and airway deadspace (adjusted R-2 0.76). The relationship between VTEIT and VTSpiro remains linear with changes in tidal volume, and stable across altered lung conditions. This may have application for monitoring and assessment in vivo.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available