4.5 Article

Reducing energy poverty: Characteristics of household electricity use in Vietnam

Journal

ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 62-70

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2020.08.007

Keywords

Energy access; Household electricity expenditure; Inequality; SDG7; Vietnam; Determinants of electricity use

Funding

  1. Yonsei University Future-Leading Research Initiative of 2017 [2017-22-0038]
  2. Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2016S1A3A2925230]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016S1A3A2925230] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite increased access to modern energy services being a key development priority, few studies have examined whether improved access is sufficient to facilitate universal energy use at the household level. Using micro data from Vietnam, we study how a national grid expansion is translated into households' electricity use over time. Our analysis reveals that household income is an important determinant of electricity consumption, and that this relationship is highly nonlinear with respect to income. We find a greater degree of inequality in electricity expenditure than we do in income. This finding suggests that a rapid increase in electricity access may not translate directly into increased use of electricity for low income households and could potentially increase the gap in energy use between high income and low income households. Lastly, we find that household characteristics, such as the education level of the household head, household size, as well as the type of housing (quality), are important factors that influence electricity consumption. (C) 2020 International Energy Initiative. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available