4.4 Review

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Complications Following Mastectomy and Prosthetic Reconstruction in Patients With and Without Prior Breast Augmentation

Journal

AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages NP763-NP770

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab028

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Asia University Hospital Research Program [10851006]
  2. Asia University and Asia University Hospital Joint Research Program [ASIA-107AUH-09]
  3. Asia University
  4. China Medical University Hospital Joint Research Program [ASIA-108-CMUH-23]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to compare postoperative complications in women undergoing skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthetic reconstruction, with or without prior augmentation. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in overall complications between the two groups, but a higher risk of hematoma formation in patients with prior augmentation. Further investigation and preoperative discussions are warranted regarding this finding.
Background: There is limited evidence available in the literature with regard to the complication profile of mastectomy and immediate prosthetic reconstruction in augmented patients. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare postoperative complications between women with vs without prior augmentation undergoing skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate prosthetic reconstruction. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in February 2020 for studies comparing women with vs without prior augmentation undergoing skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate prosthetic reconstruction with documentation of postoperative complications. Outcomes analyzed included early, late, and overall complications. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were obtained through meta-analysis. Results: Our meta-analysis, which included 6 studies comparing 241 breasts with prior augmentation and 1441 without, demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 groups in rates of early (36.7% vs 24.8%: OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.94-2.64; P = 0.09), late (10.1% vs 19.9%: OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.06-4.89; P = 0.57), and overall complications (36.5% vs 31.2%: OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.76-2.00; P = 0.40). Subgroup analysis showed a significantly higher rate of hematoma formation in the augmented group (3.39% vs 2.15%: OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.00-7.16; P = 0.05), but no difference in rates of seroma, infection, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, and prosthesis loss. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that prior augmentation does not significantly increase overall postoperative complications in women undergoing skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate prosthetic reconstruction. However, the significantly higher rate of hematoma formation in augmented patients warrants further investigation and preoperative discussion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available