4.8 Review

Hard Carbon Anodes: Fundamental Understanding and Commercial Perspectives for Na-Ion Batteries beyond Li-Ion and K-Ion Counterparts

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202002704

Keywords

anodes; commercialization; full cells; hard carbon; sodium‐ ion batteries

Funding

  1. Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) Project [G00849]
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DE170100928, DP160102627]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hard carbon is recognized as a promising anode material for alkali metal-ion batteries, particularly showing outstanding performance in sodium-ion batteries, with in-depth research and commercial prototype demonstration. Challenges and research perspectives for future development and early commercialization of HC-based sodium-ion batteries are also discussed comprehensively.
Hard carbon (HC) is recognized as a promising anode material with outstanding electrochemical performance for alkali metal-ion batteries including lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), as well as their analogs sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) and potassium-ion batteries (PIBs). Herein, a comprehensive review of the recent research is presented to interpret the challenges and opportunities for the applications of HC anodes. The ion storage mechanisms, materials design, and electrolyte optimizations for alkali metal-ion batteries are illustrated in-depth. HC is particularly promising as an anode material for SIBs. The solid-electrolyte interphase, initial Coulombic efficiency, safety concerns, and all-climate performances, which are vital for practical applications, are comprehensively discussed. Furthermore, commercial prototypes of SIBs based on HC anodes are extensively elaborated. The remaining challenges and research perspectives are provided, aiming to shed light on future research and early commercialization of HC-based SIBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available