4.8 Review

Recent Progresses on Structural Reconstruction of Nanosized Metal Catalysts via Controlled-Atmosphere Transmission Electron Microscopy: A Review

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 10, Issue 24, Pages 14419-14450

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.0c03335

Keywords

Controlled Atmosphere TEM; Structure Reconstruction; Atomic Structure of Metal Catalysts; Structure Evolution; Environmental TEM; In Situ TEM

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LD19B030001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51801182, 51971202, 51872260]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019T120502, 2020M671714]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Zhejiang Provincial Universities [2019XZZX003-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal catalysts are of great importance in the modern chemical industry. It is well-known that the structures of metal catalysts determine their properties. However, recent studies suggested that the structures of metal catalysts change dynamically under reaction conditions, resulting in the deactivation or activation of metal catalysts. This Review summarizes the latest research progresses in the structural reconstruction of metal catalysts via controlled-atmosphere transmission electron microscopy. The state-of-the-art research technologies and crucial factors affecting the nanosized metal catalyst reconstruction are discussed. Various types of reconstruction phenomena are reviewed, including sintering and dispersion, reshaping, composition evolution, surface reconstruction of metal oxides, and strong metal-support interactions. Moreover, recent studies of the structure-property relationship of metal catalysts are also reviewed. Finally, we highlight current challenges and provide the perspectives for future research of this topic. We hope this Review provides insights for the rational design of high-performance metal catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available