4.8 Article

The molecular landscape of Asian breast cancers reveals clinically relevant population-specific differences

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20173-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Newton-Ungku Omar Fund (MRC) [MR/P012442/1]
  2. Scientex Foundation
  3. Estee Lauder Companies
  4. Yayasan Petronas
  5. Yayasan Sime Darby
  6. Cancer Research UK [A16942]
  7. MRC [MR/P012442/1, MC_UU_00002/16] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecular profiling of breast cancer has enabled the development of more robust molecular prognostic signatures and therapeutic options for breast cancer patients. However, non-Caucasian populations remain understudied. Here, we present the mutational, transcriptional, and copy number profiles of 560 Malaysian breast tumours and a comparative analysis of breast cancers arising in Asian and Caucasian women. Compared to breast tumours in Caucasian women, we show an increased prevalence of HER2-enriched molecular subtypes and higher prevalence of TP53 somatic mutations in ER+ Asian breast tumours. We also observe elevated immune scores in Asian breast tumours, suggesting potential clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Whilst HER2-subtype and enriched immune score are associated with improved survival, presence of TP53 somatic mutations is associated with poorer survival in ER+ tumours. Taken together, these population differences unveil opportunities to improve the understanding of this disease and lay the foundation for precision medicine in different populations. Molecular profiling of breast cancer in non-Caucasian populations remains underexplored. Here the authors report a high prevalence of HER2-subtypes and enriched immune score with improved survival and higher rates of TP53 somatic mutations with poorer survival in ER+ tumours in a Malaysian cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available