4.1 Article

Fate of rejected manuscripts in the journal Medicina Intensiva during 2015-2017 period

Journal

MEDICINA INTENSIVA
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 271-279

Publisher

ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2020.11.006

Keywords

Rejected articles; Publication rate; Impact factor; Peer review; Bibliometrics; Gender

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that 69% of rejected manuscripts in MI journal were subsequently published in other journals, with lower impact factors and citation numbers.
Objective: To know the fate of the rejected manuscripts in Medicina Intensiva journal (MI) from 2015 to 2017 with surveillance until 2019. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Biomedical journals publication. Participants: Rejected manuscripts in MI journal. Interventions: None. Main variables of interest: Time of publication, impact factor (IF), generated citations and variables associated to publication. Results: The 69% (420) of analyzed articles (344 originals and 263 scientific letters) were rejec-ted, and 205 (48.8%) were subsequently published, with 180 citations of 66 articles. Journal IF was lower in 173 (84.4%) articles. The number of FI-valid citations was higher than the FI of MI in 21 articles. Origin of manuscript OR 2,11 (IC 95% 1.29 --3.46), female author OR 1.58 (IC 95% 1.03-2.44), english language OR 2,38 (IC 95% 1.41-4.0) and reviewed papers OR 1.71 (IC 95% 1.10-2.66) were associated to publication in PubMed database. Conclusions: The rejected articles in MI have a mean publication rate in other journals. Most of these articles are published in journals with less IF and fewer citations than the IF of MI. (c) 2021 Elsevier Espa & ntilde;a, S.L.U. y SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available