4.5 Article

Implementation-Independent Representation for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks and Humans in Processing Faces

Journal

FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2020.601314

Keywords

deep convolutional neural network; face recognition; reverse correlation analysis; face representation; visual intelligence

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31861143039, 31872786, 31600925]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2018YFC0810602]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that humans and DCNNs use similar critical information for face gender classification tasks, mainly concentrated in low spatial frequencies. Task experience in processing faces at the subordinate level seems necessary for such representational similarity between humans and DCNNs.
Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) nowadays can match human performance in challenging complex tasks, but it remains unknown whether DCNNs achieve human-like performance through human-like processes. Here we applied a reverse-correlation method to make explicit representations of DCNNs and humans when performing face gender classification. We found that humans and a typical DCNN, VGG-Face, used similar critical information for this task, which mainly resided at low spatial frequencies. Importantly, the prior task experience, which the VGG-Face was pre-trained to process faces at the subordinate level (i.e., identification) as humans do, seemed necessary for such representational similarity, because AlexNet, a DCNN pre-trained to process objects at the basic level (i.e., categorization), succeeded in gender classification but relied on a completely different representation. In sum, although DCNNs and humans rely on different sets of hardware to process faces, they can use a similar and implementation-independent representation to achieve the same computation goal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available