4.2 Article

Comparing the Efficacy of Combined Treatment with Medial Branch Block and Facet Joint Injection in Axial Low Back Pain

Journal

PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT
Volume 2021, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/1343891

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2019R1I1A3A01061885]
  2. Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1I1A3A01061885] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the pain relief effect of Medial branch nerve block (MBB), Facet joint injections (FJI), and combined treatment with MBB and FJI in patients with axial low back pain. Results showed that all three treatments significantly improved NRS and ODI scores, with no significant difference among the groups. Combined treatment did not have a pain relief effect superior to individual treatments.
Introduction. Medial branch nerve block (MBB) and facet joint injections (FJIs) can be used to manage axial low back pain. Although there have been studies comparing the MBB and FJI effects, a few studies have compared the therapeutic effects of both interventions combined with each separate intervention. This study aimed to compare the pain relief effect of MBB, FJI, and combined treatment with MBB and FJI in patients with axial low back pain. Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of patients with axial low back pain who had chart records of the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores measured before treatment and within 6 weeks after treatment. The proportion of patients with successful responses (>30%) was calculated and is presented with Wald confidence intervals. Results. We included 66 patients (33, 17, and 16 patients in the MBB, FJI, and combined treatment with MBB and FJI groups). All the patient groups showed significant posttreatment improvements in the NRS [(proportion >30% decrease: MBB 24.2% (9.6-38.9), FJI 29.4% (7.8-51.1), and MBB + FJI 25.0% (3.8-46.2)] scores and the ODI [proportion >30% decrease: MBB 39.4% (22.7-56.1), FJI 23.5% (3.4-43.7), and MBB + FJI 37.5% (13.8-61.2)] scores. Furthermore, there was no significant among-group difference in the ODI and NRS scores. Conclusion. MBB, FJI, and combined treatment with MBB and FJI can reduce axial low back pain and improve secondary functional degradation. Although combined treatment with MBB and FJI required a longer intervention time, it did not have a pain relief effect superior to that of MBB or FJI alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available