4.7 Article

Implications of the principle of effective stress

Journal

ACTA GEOTECHNICA
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 1939-1947

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-020-01068-7

Keywords

Effective stress; Interaction of solid fabric and pore water; Pore pressure neutrality of mineral; Shear bands and cracks

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This passage provides a detailed description of the principle of effective stress and its application in soil and rock, focusing on the explanation of shear strength in water-saturated soil and over-consolidated clay, as well as the neutrality related to pore water pressure pw. It also mentions the interaction between solid fabric and pore water determined by the pw-neutrality of the solid mineral, while discussing the controversial nature of numerical models due to fractal features.
While Terzaghi justified his principle of effective stress for water-saturated soil empirically, it can be derived by means of the neutrality of the mineral with respect to changes of the pore water pressure pw. This principle works also with dilating shear bands arising beyond critical points of saturated grain fabrics, and with patterns of shear bands as relics of critical phenomena. The shear strength of over-consolidated clay is explained without effective cohesion, which results also from swelling up to decay, while rapid shearing of water-saturated clay can lead to a cavitation of pore water. The pw-neutrality is also confirmed by triaxial tests with sandstone samples, while Biot's relation with a reduction factor for pw is contestable. An effective stress tensor is heuristically legitimate also for soil and rock with relics of critical phenomena, particularly for critical points with a Mohr-Coulomb condition. Therein, the pw-neutrality of the solid mineral determines the interaction of solid fabric and pore water, but numerical models are questionable due to fractal features.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available