4.5 Article

Optimal duration of endocrine therapy with extended aromatase inhibitors for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Journal

BREAST CANCER
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 630-643

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-020-01196-8

Keywords

Extended endocrine therapy; Aromatase inhibitors; Postmenopausal patients; Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer; Treatment duration

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFC0104805]
  2. Chinese Academy of Medical Science Initiative for Innovative Medicine [2017-I2M-2-003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extending endocrine therapy from 5 to 7-8 years may improve disease-free survival for postmenopausal patients with HR-positive breast cancer, especially in certain subgroups, but no significant improvement was seen when extending from 7-8 to 10 years. Extended endocrine therapy may be associated with an increased risk of bone fracture and osteopenia/osteoporosis.
Background The optimal duration of endocrine therapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) breast cancer is still unclear. This meta-analysis aims to determine the optimal duration of endocrine therapy with extended aromatase inhibitors (AI) for postmenopausal patients with HR-positive early breast cancer who have finished 5 years of endocrine therapy. Methods Eligible randomized controlled trials were classified into three categories according to the whole duration of endocrine therapy (10 years versus 5 years, 7-8 years versus 5 years, and 10 years versus 7-8 years). For each category, hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), and risk ratio (RR) for the incidence of adverse events were pooled. Results Altogether 9 RCTs enrolling a total of 22,313 postmenopausal women with HR-positive breast cancer were included. Pooled data showed an improvement in DFS when extending endocrine therapy from 5 to 7-8 years (HR = 0.79 [0.69, 0.91]), specifically among those who had been treated with only tamoxifen (HR = 0.40 [0.22, 0.73]) or sequential tamoxifen followed by AI (HR = 0.82 [0.71, 0.95]), with tumors that were node-positive (HR = 0.72 [0.56, 0.93]), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive (HR = 0.61 [0.47, 0.78]), or >= 2 cm in size (HR = 0.72 [0.51, 0.98]). However, no improvement in DFS was obtained when extending from 7-8 to 10 years (HR = 0.98 [0.87, 1.11]). In addition, the extension of endocrine therapy was not associated with an improvement in OS, but was associated with an increased risk of bone fracture and osteopenia/osteoporosis. Conclusion Patients who have been treated with AI for 5 years, with tumors that are node-negative, ER+/PR- or ER-/PR+, and < 2 cm in size do not need to receive extended AI therapy. For those who have been treated with only tamoxifen or sequential tamoxifen followed by an AI for a total of 5 years, with tumors that are node-positive, ER+/PR+ or >= 2 cm in size, 2-3 years of extended AI is necessary and maybe enough.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available