4.5 Article

Fast background subtraction with adaptive block learning using expectation value suitable for real-time moving object detection

Journal

JOURNAL OF REAL-TIME IMAGE PROCESSING
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 967-981

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11554-020-01058-8

Keywords

Background subtraction; Moving object detection; Background modeling

Funding

  1. Kwangwoon University
  2. MISP Korea under the National Program for Excellence in SW [2017-0-00096]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper introduces a method for moving object detection using fast background subtraction suitable for real-time performance. By intermittently updating the background using adaptive blocks and employing a fast background subtraction process, the design achieves fast throughput and well-rounded performance. An adaptation bias is used to compensate for lagging effects and improve precision and recall metrics.
This paper presents a method of moving object detection through a fast background subtraction technique suitable for real-time performance in wide range of platforms. An intermittent background update using adaptive blocks individually calculates the learning rate through expected difference values. Then, coupled with a fast background subtraction process, the design achieves fast throughput with well-rounded performance. To compensate for the lagging effects of intermittent background update, an adaptation bias is devised to improve precision and recall metrics. Experiments show a versatile performance in varying scenes with overall results better than conventional techniques. The proposed method achieved a fast execution speed of up to 56 fps in PC using Full HD video. It also achieved 655 fps and 83 fps in PC and ARM core-embedded platform, respectively, using the minimum input resolution of 320 x 240. Overall, it is suitable for real-time performance applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available