4.5 Article

Abrasion, Pilling, and Snagging Properties of Half-bleached Bedsheet Fabrics Made from 100% Cotton Yarns with Various Parameters.

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages 3788-3796

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1848727

Keywords

Ring yarn; yarn parameters; bedsheet; half-bleached; abrasion; pilling; snagging resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effect of yarn parameters on the abrasion, pilling, and snagging resistance of half-bleached bedsheet fabric. The results show that yarn count and twist have an impact on the performance of the bedsheets.
The bedsheet is one of the most common direct contact textile products in our daily life and it may cause discomfort during sleeping due to several factors. In this study, the effect of yarn parameters on abrasion, pilling, and snagging resistance of half-bleached bedsheet fabric has been investigated. Nine woven bedsheet fabrics were manufactured from the same warp yarn count (20Tex) and three types of weft yarn counts (21.5, 25, and 30Tex) with three incremental yarn twists for each type of yarn count. The bedsheet fabrics underwent half-bleach treatment before property evaluation. The results show that the bedsheet fabric made from coarser yarn count (30Tex) and the least twist (826 TPM) have very good abrasion resistance of 96%-97.86% (least mass loss 2.15%-3.95%) than others. The statistical analysis proves that the pilling and snagging properties of bedsheet fabrics are affected by yarn count and twist. However, abrasion resistance in the appearance change method is insignificant at an F-value of 12.761 and P-value of 0.058. Linear regression results show that yarn count (Tex) and abrasion resistance (mass loss method) has a positive correlation at Adj.R-2 value of 86.5%. Yarn twist also has a positive correlation with abrasion mass loss ratio and snagging resistance at Adj.R-2 values of 97.4% and 87%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available