4.5 Article

Peaceful revolution in genome size: polyploidy in the Nabidae (Heteroptera); autosomes and nuclear DNA content doubling

Journal

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 193, Issue 1, Pages 145-157

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa138

Keywords

18S ribosomal DNA; cytogenetics; FISH; flow cytometry; holokinetic chromosome

Categories

Funding

  1. Grant Agency of Charles University [277815/2015]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [SVV 260434/2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study analyzed genome size and the position of 18S ribosomal DNA in different species from the family Nabidae, revealing distinct chromosomal characteristics and significant differences in nuclear DNA content among the three genera studied. Notably, the results strongly support the theory of an autosomal polyploidy event in the evolution of the genus Himacerus.
Genome size and the position of 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) were analysed in two Himacerus, eight Nabis and two Prostemma species from the family Nabidae using flow cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybrization techniques. The karyotypes of Nabis biforinis and Nabis rnaoricus, each with 2n = 16 + XY, and Prostemma aeneicolle, with 2n = 26 + XY, were recorded for the first time. All the species displayed one or two 18S rDNA signals on the X chromosome and up to two signals on the Y chromosome. Several females exhibited two different types of X chromosome breakage, namely within or outside of the 18S rDNA region. Measurements of nuclear DNA content revealed significant differences between all three genera under study. Most notably, the nuclear DNA content of Himacerus species, with 2n = 32/36 + XY (2C = 9-10 pg), was double that of Nabis species, with 2n = 16 + XY (2C = 4-6 pg). Therefore, the previously rejected theory of an autosomal polyploidy event in the evolution of the genus Himacerus is strongly supported by the results of the present study and is now being resurrected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available