4.2 Article

An Empirical Study on GAN-Based Traffic Congestion Attack Analysis: A Visualized Method

Journal

WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS & MOBILE COMPUTING
Volume 2020, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2020/8823300

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61972025, 61802389, 61672092, U1811264, 61966009]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2018JBZ103, 2019RC008]
  3. Science and Technology on Information Assurance Laboratory [614200103011711]
  4. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Trusted Software [KX201902]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the development of emerging intelligent traffic signal (I-SIG) system, congestion-involved security issues are drawing attentions of researchers and developers on the vulnerability introduced by connected vehicle technology, which empowers vehicles to communicate with the surrounding environment such as road-side infrastructure and traffic control units. A congestion attack to the controlled optimization of phases algorithm (COP) of I-SIG is recently revealed. Unfortunately, such analysis still lacks a timely visualized prediction on later congestion when launching an initial attack. In this paper, we argue that traffic image feature-based learning has available knowledge to reflect the relation between attack and caused congestion and propose a novel analysis framework based on cycle generative adversarial network (CycleGAN). Based on phase order, we first extract four-direction road images of one intersection and perform phase-based composition for generating new sample image of training. We then design a weighted L1 regularization loss that considers both last-vehicle attack and first-vehicle attack, to improve the training of CycleGAN with two generators and two discriminators. Experiments on simulated traffic flow data from VISSIM platform show the effectiveness of our approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available