4.4 Article

Hot cracking tendency of flux-cored arc welding with flux-cored wires of types Ni 6625

Journal

WELDING IN THE WORLD
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 381-392

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40194-020-01035-6

Keywords

Hot crack; Nickel alloys; Flux-cored wires; Weldability tests

Funding

  1. AiF [18.099 B/DVS, 01.086]
  2. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nickel-based alloys are important in industrial sectors such as power stations, chemical apparatus, and the oil industry. The use of nickel-based flux-cored wires is less common due to higher material costs and lower recognition compared to solid wires. Flux-cored wires have technological benefits, but basic FCW may have a higher tendency for hot cracking compared to solid wires.
Due to their mechanical and corrosive properties, nickel-based alloys are very important in several industrial sectors like power stations, chemical apparatus, and the oil industry. While flux-cored arc welding (FCAW) of carbon steels often uses flux-cored wires (FCW), the use of Ni-based flux-cored wires is industrially less common. The reasons for this include the lower degree of recognition and the higher material costs compared to solid wires. In comparison to solid wires, flux-cored wires have some technological benefits such as the possibility of welding without pulsed arc technology using low-cost standard mixed gases, which has a much lower tendency to weld defects due to high penetration depth. Depending on the slag, the flux-cored wires have a good weldability and excellent mechanical properties. Based on the self-stressed and externally stressed hot crack tests, the basic FCW showed a higher hot cracking susceptibility, contrary to the original assumption. Even if the causes have not yet been finally clarified, a negative influence of the comparatively high sulfur and oxygen contents in the basic FCW is suspected. The weld metal of the solid wires showed the highest hot crack resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available