4.8 Article

Mainstream nitrogen separation and side-stream removal to reduce discharge and footprint of wastewater treatment plants

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116527

Keywords

Wastewater treatment; Nitrogen removal; Space; Energy; Ion exchange

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878403]
  2. Shuguang Plan of Shanghai [19SG49]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality of China [19DZ1204500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The activated sludge process is efficient but criticized for high upfront investment and land requirements. To address this, a sustainable strategy of nitrogen removal through AERN cycle has been developed, achieving efficient pollutant removal and cost reduction.
The activated sludge process is efficient for pollutant removal, but was criticized for its large upfront investment and land area requirements. Improving nitrogen removal to levels sufficient to reduce eutrophication is a challenge to conventional nitrification and denitrification, which is limited by process con figuration (with nitrate recirculation) and environmental inhibition. To satisfy stringent discharge standards within a compact plant footprint, a sustainable strategy by moving nitrogen removal from mainstream to side-stream is designed by a cycle of ammonium exchange, regeneration and nitrogen removal (AERN), combined with biological and physiochemical technologies. Ammonium was rapidly captured by ion exchangers, then exchanged into regenerant, and converted to N-2 by chlorination or Sharonanaerobic ammonia oxidation in the side-stream. The AERN cycle can be combined with a high-rate anaerobic/aerobic process and chemical phosphorus removal to construct a HAERN process, or inserted between a coagulation-sedimentation tank and a membrane bioreactor to construct a CAERNM process. Two AERN-based systems both achieved efficient pollutants removal (especially for nitrogen removal of 86.8-93.7%) in long-term running, and didn't impair exchange capacity and properties of ion exchangers. Compared with the conventional anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic process, AERN-based processes reduce land occupancy, upfront investments, and treatment costs by 59.9-71.1%, 25.5-38.0% and 2.3-31.0%, respectively. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available