4.7 Article

Assessment of the effect of autohydrolysis treatment in banana's pseudostem pulp

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages 306-314

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.034

Keywords

Autohydrolysis; Banana wastes; Biomass pretreatment; Biorefinery; Enzymatic digestibility; Oligosaccharides

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports of Spain [FPU15/03138]
  2. BRISK II (H2020 grant) [731101]
  3. FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology [UIDB/05183/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Banana's pseudostem pulp (BPP) has a high polysaccharides content and low lignin content, making it suitable for the biochemical platform of biorefinery. Autohydrolysis pretreatment effectively improves the enzymatic digestibility of the material.
Banana's pseudostem pulp (BPP) is a potential by-product obtained in the mechanical fiber extraction of banana's pseudostem. Its chemical characterization revealed to have an interesting composition, with a high polysaccharides content and low content in lignin, which makes it particularly relevant for the biorefinery's biochemical platform. Autohydrolysis pretreatment, studied under isothermal (140 degrees C) and non-isothermal conditions (140-220 degrees C), yielded oligosaccharides, mainly gluco-oligosaccharides, as the main soluble products. The highest oligosaccharides production (24 g/100 g raw material) was obtained at a severity factor of 2.3. Autohydrolysis pretreatment effectively disrupted the structure of the material, inducing an improvement of the enzymatic digestibility from 73% for the raw material up to 90% for the most severe conditions. Two stage autohydrolysis, with increasing severity, was also studied, allowing to obtain a higher amount of oligosaccharides (32 g/100 g raw material) and higher digestibility of the remaining solid (up to 97%). (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available