4.4 Article

Cyclic performance and simplified pushover analyses of precast segmental concrete bridge columns with circular section

Journal

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 297-312

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-016-0323-3

Keywords

precast concrete; segmental column; simplified pushover; fiber model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51208268, 51178429]
  2. K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University, Transportation Science and Technology Project of Ningbo City [201507]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo City [2015A610293]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, precast segmental concrete bridge columns became prevalent because of the benefits of accelerated construction, low environmental impact, high quality and low life cycle costs. The lack of a detailed configuration and appropriate design procedure to ensure a comparable performance with monolithic construction has impeded this structural system from being widely used in areas of high seismicity. In this study, precast segmental bridge column cyclic loading tests were conducted to investigate the performance of unbonded post-tensioned segmental bridge columns. One monolithic and two precast segmental columns were tested. The precast segmental column exhibited minor damage and small residual displacement after the maximum 7% cyclic drift; energy dissipation (ED) can be enhanced byadding ED bars. The experimental results were modeled by a simplified pushover method (SPOM), as well as a fiber model (FIBM) finite element method. Forty-five cases of columns with different aspect ratios, axial load ratios and ED bar ratios were analyzed with the SPOM and FIBM, respectively. Using these parametric results, a simplified design method was suggested by regressive analysis. Satisfactory correlation was found between the experimental results and the simplified design method for precast segmental columns with different design parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available