4.5 Review

CLINICAL UTILITY OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF LYMPHADENOPATHY

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 869-879

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.12.020

Keywords

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Lymphadenopathy; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Department of Sichuan province [2018 JY0165]
  2. West China Hospital, Sichuan University [HXFH052]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis showed that CEUS has high sensitivity and specificity in identifying lymphadenopathy, indicating its potential value in providing clinical decision support.
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in identifying lymphazdenopathy. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles through September 2020. A total of 16 articles, which included 1787 participants, were analyzed. The summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative LR and diagnostic odds ratio of CEUS for diagnosing lymphadenopathy were 0.88 (0.86-0.90), 0.90 (0.88-0.92), 6.04 (3.67-9.95), 0.15 (0.10-0.21) and 47.38 (23.45-95.66), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9405. After omitting outliers identified in a bivariate box plot and forest plot, heterogeneity was decreased, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (0.84- 0.90) and 0.87 (0.84- 0.90), respectively. Furthermore, the SROC AUC was 0.9327. In conclusion, CEUS has the potential to be a valuable tool for characterizing lymphadenopathy and could provide clinical decision support. (E-mail: drmaxuelei@gmail.com) (C) 2020 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available