4.7 Article

Numerical studies on explosion hazards of vehicles using clean fuel in short vehicular tunnels

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103649

Keywords

Explosion; Clean fuel; Vehicular tunnels

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Theme-Based Research Scheme Project Safety, Reliability, and Disruption Management of High Speed Rail and Metro Systems [T32-101/15-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study indicates the high explosion risk of LPG in SVT tunnels, requiring appropriate protective measures to ensure tunnel safety. Additionally, existing fire safety codes for SVT should be revised to include an explosion analysis of LPG taxis.
Short vehicular tunnels (SVT) with heavy traffic are commonly constructed in urban areas of densely populated cities of the Asia-Oceania Region. The introduction of vehicles using clean fuel poses new concerns on the fire safety of existing road tunnels. The explosion of a taxi using Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) occurred in a garage, alarming the need for protecting existing road tunnels against hazards in using clean energy. In this paper, explosion hazards of an LPG taxi in a section of SVT were studied by using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Flame Acceleration Simulator (FLACS). The scenario of LPG leaking into the concealed space beneath the tunnel floor level of SVT through vents at the road side is simulated. A full tank of LPG would completely be released in about 231 s. The leaked LPG in the concealed space is ignited 19 s after the complete release, i.e. at t = 250 s. Predicted results on explosion pressure and temperature illustrate that appropriate protection measures should be provided to ensure the safety of SVT. Results also suggest that the existing fire safety codes for SVT should be revised by including an explosion analysis of LPG taxis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available