Journal
TREES-STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 831-843Publisher
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-021-02084-0
Keywords
Forest hydrology; Bark hygroscopicity; Outer bark; Total bark; Physical properties of bark
Categories
Funding
- National Science Centre, Poland [DEC-2018/02/X/NZ9/03224]
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USA
- Department of Agriculture, McIntire-Stennis project [MISZ-032100]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Hygroscopicity is a crucial element of bark water storage, with the ability to reach over 60% of water holding capacity depending on tree species. Bark, as the outer layer of woody plants, reacts to wetting during rainfall and changes in relative humidity through absorption and desorption of water vapor. The study suggests that the ability of bark to absorb water vapor during non-rainfall periods affects bark saturation during rainfall and varies among tree species due to internal bark structure.
Key message Hygroscopicity is a crucial element of bark water storage and can reach >60% of water holding capacity of bark depending on tree species Bark forms the outer layer of woody plants, and it is directly exposed to wetting during rainfall and reacts to changes in relative humidity, i.e., it may exchange water with the atmosphere through absorption and desorption of water vapor. A current paradigm of bark hydrology suggests that the maximum water storage of bark empties between precipitation events and is principally controlled by bark thickness and roughness. We hypothesize that (1) the ability of bark to absorb water vapor during non-rainfall periods (i.e., hygroscopicity) leads to partial saturation of bark tissues during dry periods that may alter the rate of bark saturation during rainfall, and (2) the degree of bark saturation through hygroscopic water is a function of internal bark structure, including porosity and density, that varies among species. To address these questions, we conducted laboratory experiments to measure interspecific differences in bark physical structure as it relates to water storage mechanisms among common tree species (hickory (Carya spp.), oak (Quercus spp.), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)) in the southeastern United States. Furthermore, we considered how these properties changed across total bark, outer bark, and inner bark. We found a distinct difference between hickory and oak, whereby hickory had 5.6% lower specific density, 31.1% higher bulk density, and 22.4% lower total porosity of outer bark resulting in higher hygroscopicity compared to oaks. For all species, hygroscopicity increased linearly with bulk density (R-2 = 0.65-0.81) and decreased linearly with total porosity (R-2 = 0.64-0.88). Overall, bark hygroscopicity may constitute an average of 30% of total bark water storage capacity. Therefore, in humid climates like those of the southeastern USA, the proportion of bark that remains saturated during non-storm conditions should not be considered negligible.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available