4.7 Article

Air quality and greenhouse gas implications of autonomous vehicles in Vancouver, Canada

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102676

Keywords

Autonomous vehicles; Air pollution; Greenhouse gases

Funding

  1. Canada Research Chairs Program
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant program [RGPIN-2018-04582]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the diffusion of connected and autonomous vehicles, along with the increase of electric vehicles, can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Metro Vancouver. However, simulation results also show that if autonomous driving results in an increase in personal vehicle use, even with 85% electric vehicles, it may only lead to a 6% decrease in greenhouse gas emissions. The impact of vehicle kilometers traveled per autonomous vehicle was found to be significant in emission reduction.
This study explores vehicle fleet emissions changes due to connected and autonomous vehicle (CAV) diffusion, over the years 2030 and 2040 in Metro Vancouver, using the US Environmental Protection Agency's MOtor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES). Impacts were assessed across scenarios with varying future vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT), transit use, fuel-type, and diffusion rate. In all models, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) were reduced due to increasing electric vehicles, though reductions varied. At best, CAVs decreased GHGs by 20% compared to no-CAV conditions in 2040. At worst, we model a 6% decrease in GHGs if autonomy provokes increased use of personal vehicles (Motor City scenario), even with 85% electric vehicles. An overall reduction in emissions is seen for other pollutants, with the exception of PM, ranging from emissions reductions of up to 20% (PM exhaust) to an increase in emissions by 30% (PM2.5 brakewear) in 2040. Increased VKT per CAV had the most significant impact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available