4.6 Article

Association of immune responses of Zebu and Holstein-Friesian cattle and resistance to mycobacteria in a BCG challenge model

Journal

TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages 3360-3365

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13939

Keywords

BCG; Holstein‐ Friesian cattle; mycobacteria; natural resistance; vaccine; Zebu cattle

Funding

  1. British Council [276305277]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia [277863]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found no significant difference in the resistance to mycobacteria between naïve Holstein-Friesian and Zebu cattle, but vaccinated Holstein-Friesian cattle showed a potential trend of lower pathogen numbers compared to non-vaccinated ones. Additionally, Zebu and Holstein-Friesian cattle differed in their antigen-specific IFN-gamma secretion responses to mycobacteria. However, due to the small number of animals used in the experiment, no conclusive differences in overall control of mycobacteria were observed between the two cattle breeds.
Mycobacterium bovis is the main cause of bovine tuberculosis (BTB) in cattle and can also infect humans. Zebu cattle are considered more resistant to some infectious diseases compared with Holstein-Friesian (HF) cattle, including BTB. However, epidemiological studies may not take into account usage differences of the two types of cattle. HF cattle may suffer greater metabolic stress due to their more or less exclusive dairy use, whereas Zebu cattle are mainly used for beef production. In experiments conducted so far, the number of animals has been too small to draw statistically robust conclusions on the resistance differences between these cattle breeds. Here, we used a BCG challenge model to compare the ability of naive and vaccinated Zebu and HF cattle to control/kill mycobacteria. Young cattle of both breeds with similar ages were housed in the same accommodation for the duration of the experiment. After correcting for multiple comparisons, we found no difference between naive HF and Zebu (rho = 0.862) cattle. However, there was a trend for vaccinated HF cattle to have lower cfu numbers than non-vaccinated HF cattle (rho = 0.057); no such trend was observed between vaccinated and non-vaccinated Zebu cattle (rho = 0.560). Evaluation of antigen-specific IFN gamma secretion by PBMC indicated that Zebu and HF cattle differed in their response to mycobacteria. Thus, whilst there may be difference in immune responses, our data indicate that with the number of animals included in the study and under the conditions used in this work, we were unable to measure any differences between Zebu and HF cattle in the overall control of mycobacteria. Whilst determination of different susceptibilities between Zebu and HF cattle using the BCG challenge model will require larger numbers of animals than the number of animals used in this experiment, these data should inform future experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available