4.4 Article

Investigation of soft X-ray optical properties and their correlation with structural characteristics of zirconium oxide thin films

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 721, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2021.138552

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the use of oxide-based compound materials as coating for soft X-ray optical applications, investigating the correlation between structural characteristics and soft X-ray optical properties of zirconium oxide thin films of varying thicknesses. Results show that marginal variations in O/Zr ratio and O-vacancies in the films of different thicknesses do not significantly impact the soft X-ray optical response near the O K-edge region.
Oxide-based compound materials serve as a suitable coating material for soft X-ray optical applications. The optical performances of such materials depend on various properties like oxygen (O)/metal ratio, O-vacancies, defects, and crystallinity. In this study, we have investigated the soft X-ray optical properties and their correlation with structural characteristics of zirconium oxide thin films of thickness similar to 10 and 50 nm. The soft X-ray optical properties of the films were measured using Indus-2 soft X-ray reflectivity beamline BL-03 covering the O K-edge. To understand the influence of structural parameters, crystallinity, and the local environment of the films on the optical performance, multiple techniques like grazing incidence X-ray reflectivity, diffraction and Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy are used. It was found that a marginal variation in O/Zr ratio, O- vacancies, and a change in distortion and co-ordination number of the Zr-O and Zr-Zr bonding in the two films of different thicknesses does not influence much the behaviour of soft X-ray optical response near O K-edge region. Details of the results are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available