4.6 Review

Work-system interventions in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review exploring the gap between challenges and solutions

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08231-x

Keywords

Human factors; Checklists; Communication; Simulation; Team training

Categories

Funding

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) [HS02649101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The introduction of robots in the surgical suite has created new opportunities for success and failure, with identified barriers including communication breakdowns and equipment issues. However, there is a significant gap in solutions to these barriers. Team training, checklist development, and workspace redesign are common solutions proposed for improving efficiency and safety in Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS).
Background The introduction of a robot into the surgical suite changes the dynamics of the work-system, creating new opportunities for both success and failure. An extensive amount of research has identified a range of barriers to safety and efficiency in Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS), such as communication breakdowns, coordination failures, equipment issues, and technological malfunctions. However, there exists very few solutions to these barriers. The purpose of this review was to identify the gap between identified RAS work-system barriers and interventions developed to address those barriers. Methods A search from three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Ovid Medline) was conducted for literature discussing system-level interventions for RAS that were published between January 1, 1985 to March 17, 2020. Articles describing interventions for systems-level issues that did not involve technical skills in RAS were eligible for inclusion. Results A total of 30 articles were included in the review. Only seven articles (23.33%) implemented and evaluated interventions, while the remaining 23 articles (76.67%) provided suggested interventions for issues in RAS. Major barriers identified included disruptions, ergonomic issues, safety and efficiency, communication, and non-technical skills. Common solutions involved team training, checklist development, and workspace redesign. Conclusion The review identified a significant gap between issues and solutions in RAS. While it is important to continue identifying how the complexities of RAS affect operating room (OR) and team dynamics, future work will need to address existing issues with interventions that have been tested and evaluated. In particular, improving RAS-associated non-technical skills, task management, and technology management may lead to improved OR dynamics associated with greater efficiency, reduced costs, and better systems-level outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available