4.7 Article

Fault parameter identification in rotating system: Comparison between deterministic and stochastic approaches

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1475921720981737

Keywords

Rotating machinery; unbalance; bearing wear; model-based identification; Bayesian inference; polynomial chaos expansion

Funding

  1. FAPESP [2015/20363-6, 2016/13223-6, 2018/21581-5, 2018/24600-0]
  2. CNPq [307941/2019-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fault identification is crucial in the field of rotating machines, enabling better maintenance of expensive equipment. Common faults like unbalance and bearing wear can be identified through deterministic or stochastic methods. The Bayesian inference with polynomial chaos showed promising results for reliable identification of fault parameters.
Fault identification is a recurrent topic in rotating machines field. The evaluation of fault parameters allows better maintenance of such expensive and, sometimes, large machines. Unbalance is one of the most common faults, and it is inherent to rotors functioning. Wear in journal bearings is another common fault, caused by several start/stop cycles - when at low rotating speed, there is still contact between shaft and bearing wall. Fault parameter identification generally uses deterministic model-based methods. However, these methods do not take into account the uncertainties inherently involved in the identification process. The stochastic approach by the Bayesian inference is, then, used to account the uncertainties of the fault parameters. The generalized polynomial chaos expansion is proposed to evaluate the inference, due to its faster performance regarding the Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Deterministic and stochastic approaches were compared; all were based on experimental vibration measurements of the shaft inside the journal bearings. The Bayesian inference with the polynomial chaos showed reliable and promising results for identification of unbalance and bearing wear fault parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available