4.4 Article

Coping with Antarctic demands: Psychological implications of isolation and confinement

Journal

STRESS AND HEALTH
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 431-441

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/smi.3006

Keywords

coping strategies; extreme environment; group dynamics; mood; stress

Funding

  1. Ministry of Defense [PIDEFF 2014-2017 no06]
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnica (ANPCyT) [PICTO 2017-0068]
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Working in extreme environments like Antarctica requires a wide range of cognitive, psychological, and social competences. This study found that social support and mature coping strategies are important for recovery from stress among crew members at the Belgrano II Argentine Antarctic Station, highlighting the significance of interpersonal relationships in psychological adjustment to isolation and extreme environments.
Working in extreme environments requires a wide range of cognitive, psychological and social competences. Antarctica represents one of the most challenging habitats to work in due to its aridity, extremely cold weather, and isolated conditions. This study aimed to assess mood variations and coping strategies, as well as their possible modulation by group dynamics in a crew at the Belgrano II Argentine Antarctic Station throughout 1 year of confinement. Thirteen members of the Argentine Army completed emotional, coping and social dynamics questionnaires bimonthly in March, May, July, September and November. Results showed a significant decline in social dynamics scales, evidenced by decreases in perceived peer and hierarchical support. Additionally, coping strategies displayed a drop in mature defence throughout the expedition. A positive correlation was found between social support and recovery from stress. Our results highlight the importance of interpersonal relationships in psychological adjustment to isolation and extreme environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available