4.6 Review

Sex Differences in Adaptations in Muscle Strength and Size Following Resistance Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal

SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 503-517

Publisher

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-020-01388-4

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. University Postgraduate Award
  2. School of Medical Sciences Top-Up Scholarship from the University of New South Wales
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found sex differences in adaptations to resistance training in older adults, with females gaining more relative lower-body strength compared to males, while males gaining more absolute upper-body strength, lower-body strength, and muscle size. The interpretation of sex-dependent adaptations is heavily influenced by the presentation of results in either an absolute or relative context.
Background Reductions in muscle size and strength occur with aging. These changes can be mitigated by participation in resistance training. At present, it is unknown if sex contributes to differences in adaptation to resistance training in older adults. Objective The aim of this systematic review was to determine if sex differences are apparent in adaptations to resistance training in older adults. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data Sources Web of Science; Science Direct; SPORTDiscus; CINAHL; and MEDLINE were searched from inception to June 2020. Eligibility Criteria Studies where males and females older than 50 years of age performed identical resistance training interventions and had outcome measures of muscle strength or size. Results We initially screened 5337 studies. 30 studies (with 41 comparison groups) were included in our review (1410 participants; 651 males, 759 females). Mean study quality was 14.7/29 on a modified Downs and Black checklist, considered moderate quality. Females gained more relative lower-body strength than males (g = - 0.21 [95% CI - 0.33, - 0.10], p = 0.0003) but there were no differences in relative change for upper-body strength (g = - 0.29 [95% CI - 0.62, 0.04], p = 0.08) or relative muscle size (g = 0.10 [95% CI - 0.04, 0.23], p = 0.16). Males gained more absolute upper-body strength (g = 0.48 [95% CI 0.09, 0.88], p = 0.016), absolute lower-body strength (g = 0.33 [95% CI 0.19, 0.47], p < 0.0001), and absolute muscle size (g = 0.45 [95% CI 0.23, 0.66], p < 0.0001). Conclusion Our results indicate that sex differences in adaptations to resistance training are apparent in older adults. However, it is evident that the interpretation of sex-dependent adaptations to resistance training is heavily influenced by the presentation of the results in either an absolute or relative context. Study Registration Open Science Framework (osf.io/afn3y/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available