4.5 Article

Patient Outcomes After Single-level Coflex Interspinous Implants Versus Single-level Laminectomy

Journal

SPINE
Volume 46, Issue 13, Pages 893-900

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003924

Keywords

Coflex; interlaminar device; lumbar stenosis; outcomes; laminectomy; spondylolisthesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared postoperative outcomes of Coflex interspinous device and laminectomy, finding that single-level CID patients had higher perioperative complications, longer operative time, length of stay, and higher blood loss compared to laminectomies alone. There were no significant differences in overall revision and neurologic complication rates between the two procedures at the last follow-up.
Study Design. Retrospective cohort analysis. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of Coflex interspinous device versus laminectomy. Summary of Background Data. Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization device (CID) is indicated for one- or two-level lumbar stenosis with grade 1 stable spondylolisthesis in adult patients, as an alternative to laminectomy, or laminectomy and fusion. CID provides stability against progressive spondylolisthesis, retains motion, and prevents further disc space collapse. Methods. Patients >= 18 years' old with lumbar stenosis and grade 1 stable spondylolisthesis who underwent either primary single-level decompression and implantation of CID, or single-level laminectomy alone were included with a minimum 90-day follow-up at a single academic institution. Clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative complications were reviewed until the latest follow-up. chi(2) and independent samples t tests were used for analysis. Results. Eighty-three patients (2007-2019) were included: 37 cases of single-level laminectomy (48.6% female) were compared to 46 single-level CID (50% female). CID cohort was older (CID 69.0 +/- 9.4 vs. laminectomy 64.2 +/- 11.0, P = 0.042) and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (CID 2.59 - 0.73 vs. laminectomy 2.17 - 0.48, P = 0.020). CID patients had higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (97.50 - 77.76 vs. 52.84 - 50.63 mL, P = 0.004), longer operative time (141.91 - 47.88 vs. 106.81 - 41.30 minutes, P = 0.001), and longer length of stay (2.0 - 1.5 vs. 1.1 - 1.0 days, P = 0.001). Total perioperative complications (21.7% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.035) and instrumentation-related complication was higher in CID (10.9% vs. 0% laminectomy group, P = 0.039). There were no other significant differences between the groups in demographics or outcomes. Conclusion. Single-level CID devices had higher perioperative 90-day complications, longer operative time, length of stay, higher EBL compared to laminectomies alone. Similar overall revision and neurologic complication rates were noted compared to laminectomy at last follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available