4.6 Article

Performance loss rates of floating photovoltaic installations in the tropics

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 219, Issue -, Pages 58-64

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.019

Keywords

Floating PV (FPV); Performance loss rate; Reliability; PV performance data analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Solar Testbedding On Reservoirs Initiative (STORI) grant
  2. National University of Singapore (NUS)
  3. National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF)
  4. Singapore Economic Development Board (EDB)
  5. Holistic LCOE Reduction for Distributed Solar PV Systems in Singapore grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a detailed analysis of the performance stability of FPV systems on one of the largest FPV testbeds in the world, showing that the performance loss rates are in line with manufacturers' performance warranties and there is no significant difference in performance stability between FPV installations and rooftop reference systems.
Floating photovoltaics (FPV) is a relatively new concept for the PV community. The operating environment of FPV systems is different from that of conventional PV systems and offers the potential advantage of higher energy yield. Consequently, there is a rapid increase recently in both the installed and planned capacity of FPV systems worldwide. However, there exists a lack of knowledge and data about the performance stability of FPV systems. This paper presents, for the first time, a detailed analysis of the performance stability of FPV systems from one of the largest FPV testbeds worldwide, located on the Tengeh Reservoir in Singapore (tropical rainforest climate). The study is based on data gathered during the operation period of April 2017 to March 2020. Three commonlyused statistical methods are deployed to calculate performance loss rates (PLRs) ? ordinary least squares (OLS), seasonal and trend decomposition using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (STL) and year-on-year (YoY) methods. The mean PLRs of eight monitored FPV strings (all deploying crystalline silicon modules) based on OLS, STL and YoY are -0.7, -0.5 and -0.5%/year, respectively; the median annual PLRs (in the same order) are -0.6, -0.5 and -0.5%/year, respectively. These values are in line with the performance warranty from PV module manufacturers. Furthermore, a comparison is also made to two monitored PV strings (both deploying crystalline silicon modules) from a nearby rooftop reference system. Overall, there is no significant difference in the performance stability between the rooftop and the FPV installations in the testbed during the first three years of operation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available