4.5 Article

Digital Discretion: Unpacking Human and Technological Agency in Automated Decision Making in Sweden's Social Services

Journal

SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 445-461

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0894439320980434

Keywords

discretion; automated decision making; robotic process automation; social work; actor-network theory

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare [2019:00710]
  2. Forte [2019-00710] Funding Source: Forte

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a case study of automated decision making driven by RPA in social services in Sweden, exploring its impact on civil servants' discretion practices. It finds positive effects on ethical, democratic, and professional values, while suggesting the need for further research on long-term effects and its influence on fair and uniform decision making.
The introduction of robotic process automation (RPA) into the public sector has changed civil servants' daily life and practices. One of these central practices in the public sector is discretion. The shift to a digital mode of discretion calls for an understanding of the new situation. This article presents an empirical case where automated decision making driven by RPA has been implemented in social services in Sweden. It focuses on the aspirational values and effects of the RPA in social services. Context, task, and activities are captured by a detailed analysis of humans and technology. This research finds that digitalization in social services has a positive effect on civil servants' discretionary practices mainly in terms of their ethical, democratic, and professional values. The long-term effects and the influence on fair and uniform decision making also merit future research. In addition, the article finds that a human-technology hybrid actor redefines social assistance practices. Simplifications are needed to unpack the automated decision-making process because of the technological and theoretical complexities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available