4.6 Article

Towards wearable tremor suppression using dielectric elastomer stack actuators

Journal

SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-665X/abccdc

Keywords

dielectric elastomers; artificial muscles; tremor; soft robotics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Active wearable tremor suppression devices use actuators to reduce tremor motion, providing non-invasive and robust treatment, but are limited by the bulkiness of current engineering actuators.
Active wearable tremor suppression devices apply actuators to the human body to produce joint torques that reduce tremor motion. This potential alternative to medications and surgery has the advantage of providing robust tremor treatment that is non-invasive, but the bulkiness of typical engineering actuators currently prohibits clinical implementations. Dielectric elastomer stack actuators (DESAs) offer a potential pathway towards achieving soft, low-profile tremor suppression devices: DESAs have similar mechanical properties as human muscles and can conform to the human limb. However, low actuation levels and a lack of commercial availability limit the development of DESA-based orthoses. Employing a control approach that only suppresses tremor while allowing the actuators to follow voluntary motion passively significantly decreases actuation requirements to improve potential for clinical devices. Still, DESAs that may offer the necessary actuation characteristics require specialized equipment and techniques. This research advances DESA-based tremor suppression by experimentally demonstrating DESA-based suppression of tremor-like signals on a scaled system using easily manufactured DESAs. Further discussion quantifies the DESA parameters that will enable physical implementations of human-scale tremor suppression and identifies pathways towards achieving those parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available