4.2 Article

Inter-center variability in neonatal outcomes of preterm infants: A longitudinal evaluation of 298 neonatal units in 11 countries

Journal

SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2021.101196

Keywords

Outcomes; Variations; Infant; Preterm; International networks; Quality improvement

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [APR-126340, CTP 87 518]
  2. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
  3. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
  4. Israel Center for Disease Control
  5. Ministry of Health
  6. Health Labour Sciences Research Grant from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  7. Spanish Neonatal Society (SENeo)
  8. Swedish Government (Ministry of Health and Social Affairs)
  9. Region Stockholm and Karolinska Institutet [2020-0443]
  10. Tuscany Region
  11. Instituto de Investigaci 'on Sanitaria Carlos III (Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Kingdom of Spain) [FIS17/0131]
  12. ISCIII-Sub-Directorate General for Research Assessment and Promotion [PN 2018-2021]
  13. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [RD16/0022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Collaboration and cooperation among clinicians and neonatal units are crucial for improving neonatal outcomes. Assessing network performance by comparing outcomes across different centers can help identify areas for improvement and provide useful macro-level evaluations for healthcare professionals and policymakers.
Collaboration and cooperation of clinicians and neonatal units at regional, national, and international levels are key features of many networks or systems that aim to improve neonatal outcomes. Network performance is typically assessed by comparing individual, unit-level outcomes. In this paper, we provide insight into another dimension, i.e., inter-center outcome variation in 10 national/regional neonatal collaborations from 11 high-income countries. We illustrate the use of coefficients of variation for evaluation of mortality and a composite outcome of mortality, severe neurological injury, treated retinopathy of prematurity, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia, as a measure of inter-center variation. These inter-center variation estimates could help to identify areas of opportunities and challenges for each country/region; they also provide macro-level evaluations that can be useful for clinicians, administrators, managers and policy makers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available