4.7 Article

Relative abundance of lipid types among Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. and ameliorating homogeneous acid catalytic conditions using central composite design (CCD) for maximizing fatty acid methyl ester yield

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 771, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144700

Keywords

Microalgae; Lipidomic analysis; CCD; Fatty acid; Acid catalysis; Biodiesel

Funding

  1. Ton Duc Thang University
  2. King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia [FP-37-42]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the biodiesel potential of two hyper lipid producing strains Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. in terms of biomass yield, lipid content, and fatty acid composition. Scenedesmus sp. showed higher levels of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, making it a promising candidate for biodiesel production.
The present study has tested the biodiesel potential of two hyper lipid producing strains Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. in terms of biomass yield, quantity and quality of lipid and fatty acid composition. Biomass yield of Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. was 1.26 and 1.33 g/L, respectively on day 18 and 20. The lipid content and lipid productivity of Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. was estimated to be 21.3, 26.5% and 12.33, 14.74mg/L/d, respectively. Notably, relative abundance of lipid types in both the strains revealed >60% neutral lipids followed by glycolipids and phospholipids in minimal level. Central composite design based optimization revealed 69 and 65.4% FAME yield from Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. at 3% sulphuric acid and 65 degrees C reaction temperature. Eventually, higher levels of saturated fatty acids (similar to 45%) and monounsaturated fatty acids (similar to 34%) and make Scenedesmus sp. a promising parent material for workable biodiesel production. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available