4.7 Review

Status and prospects of marine NIS detection andmonitoring through (e) DNA metabarcoding

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 751, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141729

Keywords

Marine and coastal ecosystems; Non-indigenous species; Biosurveillance; (e)DNA metabarcoding

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology FCT, I.P. [PTDC/BIA-BMA/29754/2017]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BIA-BMA/29754/2017] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabarcoding has played a significant role in monitoring non-indigenous species in marine and coastal ecosystems, but challenges such as primer bias, faulty DNA amplification, and incomplete reference libraries exist. To enhance NIS surveillance, it is recommended to combine metabarcoding with morphological analysis or other molecular methods, and establish a standard protocol as soon as possible to generate comparable results.
In coastal ecosystems, non-indigenous species (NIS) are recognized as a major threat to biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and socio-economic activities. Here we present a systematic review on the use of metabarcoding for NIS surveillance in marine and coastal ecosystems, through the analysis of 42 publications. Metabarcoding has been mainly applied to environmental DNA (eDNA) from water samples, but also to DNA extracted from bulk or- ganismal samples. DNA extraction kits have been widely used and the 18S rRNA and the COI genes the most employed markers, but less than half of the studies targeted more than one marker loci. The Illumina MiSeq platform has been used in >50% of the publications. Current weaknesses include potential occurrence of false negatives due to the primer-biased or faulty DNA amplification and the incompleteness of reference libraries. This is particularly concerning in the case of NIS surveillance, where proficiency in species level detection is critical. Until these weaknesses are resolved, ideally NIS metabarcoding should be supported by complementary approaches, such as morphological analysis or more targeted molecular approaches (e.g. qPCR, ddPCR). Even so, metabarcoding has already proved to be a highly sensitive tool to detect small organisms or undifferentiated life stages across a wide taxonomic range. In addition, it also seems to be very effective in ballast water management and to improve the spatial and temporal sampling frequency of NIS surveillance in marine and coastal ecosystems. Although specific protocols may be required for species-specific NIS detection, for general monitoring it would be vital to settle on a standard protocol able to generate comparable results among surveillance campaigns and regions of the globe, seeking the best approach for detecting the broadest range of species, while minimizing the chances of a false positive or negative detection. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available