4.8 Article

In vivo Perturb-Seq reveals neuronal and glial abnormalities associated with autism risk genes

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 370, Issue 6520, Pages 1057-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz6063

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute, NIH [U01MH115727, R01MH096066, P50MH094271]
  2. NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  3. Harvard William F. Milton Grant
  4. Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute
  5. Klarman Cell Observatory, Howard Hughes Medical Insititue (HHMI)
  6. NIH [1R01-HG009761, 1R01-MH110049, 1DP1-HL141201]
  7. NHGRI Center for Cell Circuits CEGS grant
  8. HHMI
  9. New York Stem Cell Foundation
  10. Mathers Foundation
  11. Poitras Center for Affective Disorders Research at MIT
  12. Hock E. Tan and K. Lisa Yang Center for Autism Research at MIT
  13. J. and P. Poitras

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number of disease risk genes and loci identified through human genetic studies far outstrips the capacity to systematically study their functions. We applied a scalable genetic screening approach, in vivo Perturb-Seq, to functionally evaluate 35 autism spectrum disorder/neurodevelopmental delay (ASD/ND) de novo loss-of-function risk genes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we introduced frameshift mutations in these risk genes in pools, within the developing mouse brain in utero, followed by single-cell RNAsequencing of perturbed cells in the postnatal brain. We identified cell type-specific and evolutionarily conserved gene modules from both neuronal and glial cell classes. Recurrent gene modules and cell types are affected across this cohort of perturbations, representing key cellular effects across sets of ASD/ND risk genes. In vivo Perturb-Seq allows us to investigate how diverse mutations affect cell types and states in the developing organism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available