4.3 Article

Comparison of the effects of colonic electrical stimulation and prucalopride on gastrointestinal transit and defecation in a canine model of constipation

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 137-144

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1856919

Keywords

Colonic electrical stimulation; prucalopride; slow transit constipation; gastrointestinal transit; defecation

Funding

  1. China-Japan Friendship Hospital Foundation [2019-1-QN-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of colonic electrical stimulation and prucalopride on gastrointestinal transit and defecation, showing that both treatments have similar short-term effects on improving gastrointestinal transit and stool consistency, but colonic electrical stimulation outperforms prucalopride in inducing defecation in the short term. Ideal levels of endurance and histocompatibility were observed in animals undergoing colonic electrical stimulation.
Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effects of colonic electrical stimulation (CES) and prucalopride on gastrointestinal transit and defecation and to verify the safety of CES in a canine model of constipation. Methods Eight beagles received CES implantation and induction drugs for slow transit constipation (STC). In the STC model, the gastrointestinal transit time (GITT), colonic transit time (CTT), stool frequency and stool consistency were assessed to compare the effects of CES and prucalopride on gastrointestinal transit and defecation. The histocompatibility of the implantable device was evaluated. Results The individualized parameters for CES varied greatly among the animals, and the GITTs were not significantly shortened by CES or prucalopride; however, both the CES and prucalopride treatment significantly accelerated CTT and improved stool consistency compared with sham stimulation. CES treatment also resulted in significantly higher stool frequency than prucalopride treatment, which did not significantly change the stool frequency. No severe inflammation response was detected in the gross and microscopic appearance around the implants. Conclusion CES and prucalopride treatment may yield similar short-term effects for improving gastrointestinal transit and stool consistency, and CES outperformed prucalopride treatment in terms of defecation inducement in the short term. There were ideal levels of endurance and histocompatibility for the animals that underwent CES.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available