4.7 Article

Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Low-Density Volcanic Pyroclasts: Application to Shallow Foundations

Journal

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 1647-1670

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-020-02341-7

Keywords

Low-density pyroclasts; Collapsible failure criterion; Bearing capacity; Characteristic lines method; Shallow foundations

Funding

  1. Canary Islands Government of Spain [82-309-0-001-(IF)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research focuses on calculating the bearing capacity of low-density volcanic Pyroclasts by developing a theoretical basis for an appropriate failure criterion for collapsible rocks, and proposing a mathematical characteristic lines method to solve the ultimate load problem of shallow foundation rocks with collapsible failure criteria. The method distinguishes between plastic failure wedges and failure due to destructuring based on rock parameters and external confining load, providing an analytical solution that is also presented in design abacuses for ease of use. The proposed formulation is validated using numerical models, resulting in satisfactory comparisons of bearing capacity values and analytical rupture mechanisms.
The present research focuses on the calculation of the bearing capacity of low-density volcanic Pyroclasts. First, the theoretical basis that define an adequate failure criterion for collapsible rocks based on the parameters that characterize them are developed here. Second, a mathematical characteristic lines method is proposed to resolve the ultimate load of shallow foundation rocks with collapsible failure criterion. This method leads to an analytical solution that differentiates two possible rupture mechanisms depending on the rock parameters and external confining load: (a) plastic failure wedge; (b) failure due to destructuring. The analytical solution is also represented in design abacuses to make it easy and quick. Finally, the proposed formulation is validated using numerical models by implementing the collapse criterion as a model defined by the user in a finite difference code. The result is a satisfactory comparison of bearing capacity values and the analytical rupture mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available