The cost-effectiveness of different approaches to exercise and corticosteroid injection for subacromial pain (impingement) syndrome

Objectives To determine whether physiotherapist-led exercise intervention and US-guided subacromial CS injection is cost-effective when compared with standard advice and exercise leaflet and unguided injection in patients with subacromial pain (impingement) syndrome. Methods An incremental cost-utility analysis using patient responses to the five-level EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire was undertaken from a healthcare perspective alongside a 2x2 factorial randomized trial with 256 participants over a 12-month follow-up period. Uncertainty was explored through the use of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Results The cost-utility analysis indicated that physiotherapist-led exercise was associated with an incremental cost of 155.99 (95% CI 69.02, 241.93) and 0.031 (95% CI -0.01, 0.07) additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 5031 per QALY gained and an 85% chance of being cost-effective at a threshold of pound 20 000 per QALY gained compared with the advice and exercise leaflet. US-guided injection was associated with an incremental cost of pound 15.89 (95% CI -59.36, 109.86) and 0.024 (95% CI -0.02, 0.07) additional QALYs, an ICER of pound 662 per QALY gained and a 83% chance of being cost-effective at a threshold of pound 20 000 per QALY gained compared with unguided injection. Conclusion Physiotherapist-led exercise was cost-effective compared with the advice and exercise leaflet, and US-guided injection was cost-effective when compared with unguided injection. Clinical trial registration ISRCTN, http://www.isrctn.com, ISRCTN42399123

Automated summary

A cost-utility analysis was conducted in this study to compare the cost-effectiveness of physiotherapist-led exercise intervention and US-guided subacromial CS injection with standard advice and exercise leaflet, as well as unguided injection, for patients with subacromial pain syndrome. The results indicated that physiotherapist-led exercise and US-guided injection were both cost-effective options compared to the alternatives.