4.7 Review

Rituximab for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a systematic review of observational studies

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 1640-1650

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab046

Keywords

systematic review; rituximab; eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; observational studies; ANCA-associated vasculitis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic review was conducted to analyze the use of RTX and other biologic agents in EGPA patients, revealing that most evaluable patients achieved remission. However, sources of heterogeneity and differences in study design limited the clear interpretation and applicability of the results in clinical practice.
Objective. To analyse the available evidence about the use of rituximab (RTX) and other biologic agents in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) patients and to provide useful findings to inform the design of future, reliable clinical trials. Methods. A systematic review was performed. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane library databases on RTX, and an extensive literature search was conducted on other biologic agents. Results. Forty-five papers pertinent to our questions were found: 16 retrospective cohort studies, 8 case series, 3 prospective cohort studies and 18 single case reports, for a total of 368 EGPA patients. More than 80% of evaluable patients achieved complete or partial remission with a tendency towards a higher rate of complete response in the pANCA-positive subgroup. Conclusion. Although the majority of the evaluable EGPA patients treated with RTX appears to achieve complete remission, we strongly believe that a number of sources of heterogeneity impair a clear interpretation of results and limit their transferability in clinical practice. Differences in design, enrolment criteria, outcome definition and measurement make a comparison among data obtained from studies on RTX and other biologic agents unreliable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available