4.7 Article

Electricity generation and storage in microbial fuel cells with porous polypyrrole-base composite modified carbon brush anodes

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 162, Issue -, Pages 2220-2226

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.032

Keywords

Capacitive anode; Microbial fuel cell; Green energy; Renewable energy

Funding

  1. Special plan for young Reserve Talents of Harbin University of Commerce, China [2019CX30]
  2. Research Project Fund of Harbin University of Commerce, China [2019DS082]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) equipped with three-dimensional (3D) electrodes are widely used in wastewater treatment. However, the power output and energy storage of MFCs with 3D anodes are still limited in application. Here, a biocompatible, capacitive, and adhesive polypyrrole, carboxymethyl cellulose, carbon nanotube/carbon brush (PPy-CMC-CNTs/CB) material was prepared, that was integrated into a composite to obtain a high-capacitance 3D anode. An SEM showed that the composite anode had a 3D-macroporous structure that had a large surface area, providing more places for the attachment and growth of microorganisms. The power density of the MFC with a PPy-CMC-CNTs/CB composite anode (2970 mW/m(2)) was 4.34 times greater than that of an MFC with a bare anode (683 mW/m(2)). In the tests with a charge for 15 min and discharge for 45 min, it was observed that the stored charge of the bioanode (333 mC/cm(2)) was 23.67 times higher than that of the bare anode (14.07 mC/cm(2)). High-throughput sequencing revealed that the modified composite anode had excellent biocompatibility and selective enrichment of electrogenic bacteria. This study provided a simple and environmentally-friendly modification to enable a PPy-CMC-CNTs/CB composite anode to promote energy storage and output performance of MFCs. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available