4.5 Article

Shared socioeconomic pathways for climate change research in Finland: co-developing extended SSP narratives for agriculture

Journal

REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-020-01734-2

Keywords

Climate change; Diet; Food system; Future scenarios; Environment; Policy

Funding

  1. PLUMES (Pathways linking uncertainties in model projections of climate and its effects) project (Academy of Finland) [277276, 292836]
  2. European Commission [603416]
  3. Joint Programming Initiative on Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change (FACCE-JPI) MACSUR2 (Modelling European Agriculture with Climate Change for Food Security) Knowledge Hub, Academy of Finland [316215, 330915]
  4. Natural Resources Institute Finland BoostIA (Boosting Integrated Assessment modelling in Luke for sustainability analysis) project
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [292836, 277276, 330915, 330915, 292836, 277276] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers and stakeholders in Finland co-developed narrative descriptions of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) for the agriculture and food sector through intensive discussions at a workshop, reflecting careful sector-based, national-level interpretations and consensus narratives. Finnish narratives compared to global SSP narratives emphasize environmental quality, highlighting important critical remarks and minority viewpoints.
Shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs), developed at global scale, comprise narrative descriptions and quantifications of future world developments that are intended for climate change scenario analysis. However, their extension to national and regional scales can be challenging. Here, we present SSP narratives co-developed with stakeholders for the agriculture and food sector in Finland. These are derived from intensive discussions at a workshop attended by approximately 39 participants offering a range of sectoral perspectives. Using general background descriptions of the SSPs for Europe, facilitated discussions were held in parallel for each of four SSPs reflecting very different contexts for the development of the sector up to 2050 and beyond. Discussions focused on five themes from the perspectives of consumers, producers and policy-makers, included a joint final session and allowed for post-workshop feedback. Results reflect careful sector-based, national-level interpretations of the global SSPs from which we have constructed consensus narratives. Our results also show important critical remarks and minority viewpoints. Interesting features of the Finnish narratives compared to the global SSP narratives include greater emphasis on environmental quality; significant land abandonment in SSPs with reduced livestock production and increased plant-based diets; continued need for some farm subsidies across all SSPs and opportunities for diversifying domestic production under scenarios of restricted trade. Our results can contribute to the development of more detailed national long-term scenarios for food and agriculture that are both relevant for local stakeholders and researchers as well as being consistent with global scenarios being applied internationally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available